| What do you think about fuel/air magnetic activators (magnetisers) ? |
| they work great |
|
20% |
[ 1 ] |
| they work but not as good as they say ;) |
|
20% |
[ 1 ] |
| no change to engine characteristics |
|
60% |
[ 3 ] |
| they cause engine works worse |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| I don't know |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 5 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Yawor
Contributing Member
Joined: 09 May 2005
Posts: 269
Location: Pultusk, POLAND
|
 Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 7:22 pm Post subject: What do you think about fuel/air magnetic activators? |
 |
|
A bit off-topic but I don't see an "OTHER" category so the main question is:
 What do you think about fuel/air magnetic activators (magnetisers) ?
I'm curious what is your opinion about diffrences in engine work after installing magnetisers. How did it affect fuel consumption, engine dynamics, mechanical shape, etc.
I'm testing that kind of "upgrade" on 3 different cars for 3 weeks now. I can't say nothing about fuel consumption yet (I did only about 1500km with my car, 2 other cars about 300km each). I think my vectra 2,0DTi makes a bit less noise and accelerates a bit easier at low rpm but these are only my SUBJECTIVE feelings. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Yawor
Contributing Member
Joined: 09 May 2005
Posts: 269
Location: Pultusk, POLAND
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vectra B 2,0 DTi Y20DTH
magtisers installed at 101000km
after 3000km: average fuel consumption raised from 6.4 to 6.8 l/100km & varies (-0.2 +0,3), accelerates a bit easier, specially at lower rpm
4000km: fuel consumption back to normal (6.4 +/- 0.2)
8000km: average fuel consumption between 6.1 & 6.5 l/100km, car accelerates faster and "turbo gap" is less noticable. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
